Reply to Kelly, Cutright, and Hittle

Reply to Kelly et al

REPLY: We thank Kelly and coworkers (3) for their comments. We agree that some of the Ren-2 animals in our study did develop malignant hypertension, as discussed in our report (see the penultimate paragraph of the DISCUSSION in Ref. 1). We included all animals which survived to the end of the study in the final analysis because we feel that the exclusion of animals with malignant hypertension w...

Reply to Sullivan and Kelly and Skowronski et al.

TO THE EDITOR—We appreciate the in-sightful comments of Sullivan and Kelly and Skowronski et al concerning our article on influenza vaccine effectiveness in households during the 2010–2011 season. The comments of Sullivan and Kelly overall confirm, in another setting and influenza season (2012), that past vaccination may have a negative effect on current season vaccine effectiveness (VE). They ...

From Kelly Criterion to Investment-Consumption Problem

This paper is intended as a literature retrieval. In the first part we introduce Kelly criterion and show some of its basic properties. Then we define general HARA (Hyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion) utility function and investment consumption problem. By stochastic optimal control we demonstrate solution to this problem for special class of HARA utility and show basic model with proportional t...

On determining the intracranial sources of visual evoked potentials from scalp topography: A reply to Kelly et al. (2012)

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Q3 Article history: Accepted 5 September 2012 Available online xxxx

The Authors’ Reply